Some pet food testing in Europe found 14 of Teen pet foods that include meats not revealed on product labels. Loss of pet food transparency is really a worldwide concern.

In these studies (and this one would have been a study), researchers screening 17 popular companies of pet food purchased from Europe. The study searched animal protein sourced with cow, horse, pig and also chicken. Of significant worry, “there was detection for substantial levels of unspecified pet species in most merchandise tested.” Unspecified animal type could be any bestial other than cow, horse, pig and chicken. Allow us to hope these research workers will do further Genetics analysis to determine the actual animal that was referred to as ‘unspecified’.

Quoting the report made by this study…

“A major finding was initially the relative great quantity of proteins from unspecified animal species with 14 of the 17 products. Amongst these kinds of 14 samples, bovine, porcine together with chicken DNA put together in various proportions along with combinations but had not been explicitly named about the product labels. With a couple products (“Encore Chicken Breast having Brown Rice” and “Chappie Original”), a detection of poultry DNA only appeared to be consistent with their announced chicken contents. A couple products (“Hill’s Prescription Eating routine R/D Feline Weight Loss” as well as “Cooperative Gourmet Terrine with Rooster and Game”) appear to have no and 1% fowl DNA respectively, in contrast to expectations.”

“Another important observation concerned any headline description on pet food labels. Eight products with popular descriptions containing the word “with beef” comprised between 14% and also 56% bovine DNA. Only two of the seven were found to be able to contain more bovine Genetic make-up (>50%) than pig together with chicken DNA joined together. With the remaining five samples, three contained more pig as compared to bovine DNA. Another Six headline labels which will highlighted “chicken” or “with chicken” enclosed 1% to 100% chicken DNA of which two products and services contained more this halloween or bovine than bird DNA.”

“Whilst the existing practice in pet food labelling appears to be in just current regulatory tips, our findings possess highlighted two correlated weaknesses in product or service labelling that could badly affect consumers (pets) and their owners. First of all, in most products evaluated (14 out of 19), substantial protein items in cow, pig and poultry were found but these pet species were not explicitly specified on product labels. Secondly, headline item information may not count with buyers’ expectations. Our own findings highlighted what could be regarded as a considerable mismatch within the labelling standard within the pet food industry and just what the purchaser might relatively expect. For example, it might be reasonable for a buyer to expect from a product noticeably labelled as “beef stew” to possess “beef” and not “chicken” as the major animal constituent. It usually is a surprise to customers to discover that noticeably described contents including “beef” on a tin could possibly, within the Guidelines, be a minor ingredient, don’t have a bovine skeletal muscle (meat) and contain a largest part of unidentified animal protein.”

My thanks to these research workers for highlighting all over again that pet food customers face tremendous troubles when trying to find some sort of honestly labeled canine. Now we need to get regulatory authorities to step up (worldwide) together with protect pets plus pet food consumers by means of strengthening regulations plus enforcement. Unspecified animal protein will be unacceptable. It’s time for it to put the consumer and pet first – trade second.

More links on this pet food testing:



Have you read through Buyer Beware?? Click Here

Cooking for pets made easy, An evening meal PAWsible

Find Healthy Pet Foodstuff in Your Area Click Here